Published review criteria for security decisions.

Denver Security Review evaluates security organizations through a documented framework designed for business owners, agency leaders, and professional service buyers.

Weighted criteria keep the review consistent.

20%

Compliance and Authority

Licensing posture, insurance awareness, authorization to act, business standing, and scope clarity.

20%

Documentation Quality

Case notes, incident records, timelines, evidence references, supervisory review, and defensible recordkeeping.

20%

Confidentiality and Ethics

Information handling, professional boundaries, conflict controls, sensitive-client procedures, and conduct standards.

15%

Client Communication

Intake clarity, expectation setting, escalation paths, status updates, final reporting, and decision-ready summaries.

15%

Evidence and Incident Handling

Collection discipline, preservation notes, chain-of-custody awareness, retention practices, and report consistency.

10%

Professional Reputation

Operational maturity, leadership accountability, complaint responsiveness, training cadence, and industry participation.

How a review moves from intake to publication.

  • Eligibility check and category assignment
  • Document request and source review
  • Operational interview or clarification request
  • Scoring, evidence notes, and findings summary
  • Correction window before public recognition or profile publication